Dekker, T.; Rodrigues, L.N.; Olsthoorn, T.; Giesen, N. van de
You can share this results page using this direct link.
You can reset these results and run the automated analysis again. Please be aware that this will also reset the presence of the item metadata and the full text, in case you have set these manually to found with the links below.
This tool makes an query in Google Scholar to find your item. Unfortunately, Google is getting more and more aggressive in blocking robots and tools like this one to make automatic queries. So if our automated request has failed, you should check manually.
Click here to tryout the query that was used to detect your item. It is a simple query on the URL of the item. In case you don't see a reference to your repository on the first page, make sure to follow the link "All X versions", and look for an entry about your repository there. Different occurences of the same publication get clustered together.
If you have checked for yourself, and if you found the item, click here to indicate that the metadata for this item was FOUND in Google Scholar
Google scholar expects the authors of the item to be exposed as part of the citation metadata tags. Prior to DSpace 5, all authors were exposed in a single citation_authors tag. While this is better than nothing, it's still highly advised to expose authors in separate citation_author tags. Upgrade to DSpace 5 or higher, or implement this customization on your pre DSpace 5 version.
Google scholar expects a direct link to the fulltext in the tag citation_pdf_url. Without the link to the file expressed in this tag, it is possible Google Scholar will only list the metadata or not even list the item at all.
To assess the correctness of the metadata provided by the repository, Google Scholar tries to match the order of the authors in het metadata, with the order of the authors in the fulltext. This test only works on files smaller than 10MB.
When authors on a DSpace item are ordered alphabetically, it can indicate that the original author order (as listed on the publication), was not preserved. However, it is also very much possible that the alphabetical order is indeed the correct order. DSpace 5.4 contains an important bugfix for this specific order. If you are on versions 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3, an upgrade is recommended.